|
|
VOMIT UK 09/99
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 27 February 1999
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF or P2 UK stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are.
MUTUAL AID
CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB. Fax 01223 327042. Ph 01223 327634 (Suzon Forscey-Moore, American Law Researcher)
POW TRUST, (A charitable organisation) 295a Queenstown Road, London SW8 3NP. Tel.0171 720 9767 Fax 0171 498 0477 (Gen.Secy. Peter Sainsbury).
NEW DEMOCRACY ACTION, PO Box 187, Chesterfield, Derbys.S40 2DU Ph/Fax 01246 555713 (Organiser Eric Giles)
SECRET SOCIETIES
Yakusa, the Yardies, the IRA, the Orange Paramilitaries, the Mafia, the Knights of St Columba, the Masons, Opus Dei, the Bilderberg Council, the Tongs. End of introduction.
COURT HEARING
Geoffrey Scriven is due in Warrington County Court for a hearing of case No. 56 of 1998 at 11.10 a.m. Monday 1 March 1999 (Monday first). Mr Scriven has requested an open court hearing in accordance with the law and an ECHR judgment in Scarth v UK. Mr Norman Scarth will be Mr Scriven's Mackenzie Friend.
THE P2 LODGE
We quote from the Sunday Telegraph Magazine. "Roberto Calvi had become one of the most powerful men in Italy. He belonged to the secretive Masonic Lodge known as P2, whose members included a powerful phalanx of cabinet ministers, judges, generals and tycoons. The lodge represented the very core of the nation's establishment, and its senior members ran what amounted to an alternative branch of state." Added to the list of crooks should be members of the professions including the medical and accountancy professions.
You can be assured that Italy, France, Germany, the USA and the UK have their own versions of the P2 Lodge and that they are responsible for judicial terrorism. We have learned from an impeccable source that Nigeria, a former British colony, is ruled by a Masonic hierarchy. It is absolutely corrupt and has a terrible human rights record. It membership of the Commonwealth has been suspended. Its army stands shoulder to shoulder with forces supplied with arms by the UK to Sierra Leone. It should be a rich country. Its economy is in ruins.
The ordinary Mason is a mug basking in the reflected glory of and enjoying marginal privileges from his hierarchy. When will you brothers waken up? There is the equivalent of a P2 lodge in every country that tolerates Masonry. The P2 lodge went underground when it was exposed.
THE FEMALE MASONS
In a letter to the Guardian (UK) on 19 February J M Hamill, Director of Communications, United Grand Lodge of England writes "there are (in italics) women Freemasons". Our information has always been that there are Masons but no Freemasons and that the criminal fraternity was for men only. Women were profane. So what is going on? Is Hamill referring to hermaphrodites or Masons who have undergone sex changes. Or is he referring to the homosexual Masons? Or is the Order of the Eastern Star now affiliated to the Craft? Does this account for the increased number of crooked females in positions of authority. Will there now be more female judges, Chief Constables and MPs?
What about the Masonic oath? Do the women have to wear trousers so that they can roll up their left trouser leg? How do they bare their left breast and how far away is the dagger held? Does the noose round their necks encompass the hair or go underneath their mops? Are women ever black balled or gang banged?
Note that we reported some time ago that the Lord Chancellor could find that all judges including females were Masons or that all judges were not Masons.
When will the ordinary decent Mason waken up?
NORMAN SCARTH and GEOFFREY SCRIVEN
Mr Scarth is a stickler for the truth. We fear his anger. He asks us to make corrections to last week's report. While on the Murmansk run he pulled bodies out of the Arctic Ocean and not the North Atlantic. The report showing how a bent judge and court officials had denied him a hearing by bringing a hearing forward in a different court should also have mentioned that the judgement stated that Mr Scarth had been represented by a solicitor at the hearing. Mr Scarth did not engage a solicitor and was unaware of the hearing. Geoffrey Scriven had a similar experience in Manchester District Registry when the judge (Needham) had him present in court and in a hospital bed at the same time. Newman took the Roache v Carter-Ruck case. Mr Scriven is hoping to link up with Derek Jameson and William Roache in pursuit of Carter-Ruck. Mr Scriven has advised Mr Roache to refuse to pay costs because "fraud unravels everything". (Lord Denning).
THE ADSHEADS AND THE YELLOW PRESS
By "yellow" we mean "cowardly and corrupt". Last week we reported how the Bucks Free Press was biased in favour of the local authorities. Now we have the same allegations levelled at the Buxton Advertiser, the confidant of Tom Levitt, MP. The Adsheads complained to the Buxton Advertiser on 11 February 1999 that this rag was suppressing information about the criminal activities of the authorities. In particular the Adsheads refer to a judgement for fraud, conversion and misrepresentation that they obtained on 1 June 1998 against the Lord Chancellor, the Legal Aid Board, the Manchester District Registry, Smith Forts (solicitors and Legal Aid franchisees acting for the party to whom they had awarded Legal Aid), Kevin Cummins and Martin Cummins. The rag never reported that judgement even although millions of pounds were involved. When the authorities attack the Adsheads from another direction the rag highlights the adverse comments of the authorities without attempting to present the Adsheads' side of the case.
It could be said that the Adsheads are not without sin. Will someone please whip Gerald Adshead's ass and tell him to let us have the first instalment of his story instead of peeing against the wind. That is one way to get your own back but it harms Gerald more than it harms the Cardinal.
LETTER FROM THE CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING
We posted a copy of this letter to Chris Mullin, MP, Chairman of the parliamentary Home Affairs Committee. A few days later the London Regional Labour Party faxed copies of Vomit to Suzon Forscey-Moore, the organiser of CFAFH, until her fax machine ran out of paper. We had the same experience. We suspect that the Prime Minister is getting worried about drugs, the Seychelles, the John Drew stitch up and the fact that Continuity IRA is not buying his bullshit.
Note the familiar pattern of victimisation described in the letter. The police, the Inland Revenue and the courts act together to render an Irishman homeless.
### 18 February 1999. Letter from the Campaign for a Fair Hearing (CFAFH) to
His Excellency Mr Edward Barrington, The Irish Embassy, 17 Grosvenor Place, LONDON SW1X 7HR
Dear Ambassador Barrington, Re: Mr Patrick Cullinane of 48 Girton Avenue, Kingsbury, London.
Thank you for your response of 9th February.
It is not true that Mr Cullinane has failed to exhaust all remedies under UK domestic law. There are NO remedies. UK courts almost never set aside rulings on arguments of fact - Mr Cullinane's position. On 17 November 1998, Lord Woolf, head of the civil division of the Court of Appeal, disclosed in practice direction:
'The Court of Appeal will rarely interfere with a decision based on the judge's evaluation of oral evidence as to the primary facts or if an appeal would involve examining the fine detail of the judge's factual investigation… The Court of Appeal does not interfere with the exercise of discretion of a judge unless the court is satisfied the judge was wrong. The burden on an appellant is a heavy one…'
One of the major causes of injustice in the UK is the refusal of judges to set aside the decisions of their colleagues. Once the Inland Revenue has ruled, Mr Cullinane's fate was as good as sealed. In 1974, J A G Griffith, Professor of Law at the London School of Economics, described the lack of independence and impartiality in THE POLITICS OF THE JUDICIARY. In the UK, who you are is almost always more important than evidence or argument. In 1994-95, the 600 Litigants in Person looking for a domestic remedy in the Court of Appeal had a 96% failure rate.
CFAFH's class action in the European Court of Human Rights (Application 42016/98) argues that the rights and freedoms described in Articles 6, 10, 13 and 14 are violated by the Lord Chancellor's provision of secret summaries to the judiciary. Article 13 is the right to an effective remedy. Mr Cullinane's complaints are identical to those presented by CFAFH.
You object to Mr Cullinane's allegations of genocide, torture and persecution. Although, like many victims of injustice, his language is extreme, I can confirm that the specific actions of which he complains (abusive and threatening treatment by the police, for example) are not unknown, particularly to members of the ethnic communities.
Mr Cullinane stands to be evicted from his home in five days. May I request that you take his plight to the highest level? Thank you for whatever you are willing to do.
Yours sincerely, Suzon Forscey-Moore, Organiser. ###
EMAIL FROM JOHN EAYRS jee@jesoftware.freeserve.co.uk
### I was at the Court of Appeal library today 20th February. I read the Court of Appeal Civil Division Review of the Legal year 1997/98. In this review was the following on p5
"Throughout the year, we have continued to use the "Blitz" to focus the attention of the Court on a particular type of case to reduce backlogs. We had a further "Blitz" on leave applications in December 1998, in preparation for the extension of the leave requirement."
I will leave you to realise the implications of this. John Eayrs ###
Comment:- There is nothing new about the implications. The Lord Chancellor is taking short cuts to cut costs with a fine disregard for the merits of a case or the administration of justice. Par for the course!
DELOITTE TOUCHE AND THE AUDIT COMMISSION
Deloitte Touche are District Auditors (external auditors) appointed by the Audit Commission to the following councils:- Westminster, Buckinghamshire, Aylesbury Vale, Chiltern, Dacorum, Luton, St Albans, South Bedfordshire and Chesham Bois. We suspect that there are other councils being "audited" by the same company. Luton had Deloitte Touche foisted on it by the Audit Commission because it was considered advisable to have regular changes of District Auditor. South Bedsfordshire was unhappy to have Deloitte Touche foisted onto it. Yet John Magill of Touche Ross, has been District Auditor for Buckinghamshire and Westminster for more than ten years. Most of these councils have had allegations of corruption levelled at them and have been accused of being dominated by Freemasonry.
The first person to detect corruption should be the District Auditor. Apart from John Magill exposing the Porter Mafia in Westminster City Council we know of no case where a District Auditor has uncovered corruption. That happened because a doctor in Westminster blew the whistle and attracted a lot of publicity. Another person who should have exposed the guilty councils was the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman occasionally finds that there has been malpractice but only in cases that don't really matter. We now find that the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors is protecting Westminster and that the Legal Services Ombudsman is keeping quiet about this. So also is the Law Society. Do you get the picture? We are seeing how P2 UK works.
SIR PAUL CONDON
We gave up on this man a long time ago. Several candidates have been suggested as his successor when it is obvious that Labour selected the successor one year ago when it brought Deputy Commissioner John Stevens down from the Labour centre of corruption, Northumbria. That is the Masonic police force that has persecuted Maurice Kellett for years.
DIRTY DACORUM
Councillor Stanley Sharpe, Libdem chairman of the committee on standards has acted like a true Mason in stating privately that Masons must register their membership but informing councillors that they must declare their interests generally without reference to Freemasonry. What a traitor the man is to democracy. Libdem councillors in Dacorum will sell their souls to get their snouts in the trough. They have kept a corrupt Labour administration in power.
We have to correct a mistake. Councillor Johnston is a Berkhampstead Town Councillor but should be a Dacorum councillor after the next election. He is transparently honest.
MAURICE KELLETT (continued)
Maurice has been a victim of the Labour Masons of the Northeast, which has been at the heart of Labour corruption for many years. Last week he reported how Nancy Bone solicitors were taking him for a ride.
On 24 October 1994 his wife was finally put out of business after a burglary of her premises. The police were provided with evidence of the identity of the burglars but did nothing. After he was granted emergency Legal Aid he sacked Nancy Bone solicitors. Bone immediately sent Mr Kellett a bill for several thousands of pounds with the obvious
intention of using the documentary evidence as lien against the payment of an extortionate bill. Mr Kellett was ordered by District Judge Jones on 17 November 1994 in Durham County Court to lodge video evidence in the court within 21 days. Jones was aware that Nancy Bone solicitors were retaining the video and other evidence. Present at the
hearing was solicitor Alison Scott who later stated that she had not acted for Mr Kellett's neighbour (Carr) before January 1996. On 19 December 1994 Judge Scott-Phillips refused to make an order for Nancy Bone solicitors to allow Mr Kellett to copy his documents on Bone's premises. Scott-Phillips stated that since Jones had advised Mr Kellett to make the application for recovery of his documents and video Jones would have to make the order and Jones was on holiday until the end of January 1995. To rub salt in the wound Scott-Phillips stated that he would probably not have admitted the video evidence. Why does Scott-Phillips think we have CCTV? Scott-Phillips further stated that the
trial could go ahead without Mr Kellett's documentary evidence - evidence which he had not seen. In view of this judicial malpractice Mr Kellett contacted his MP, Roland Boyes. At a meeting with Boyes on 5th January 1995 Boyes grabbed Mr Kellett, shook him and asked him to demonstrate the Masonic handshake. Boyes' secretary, Pat Elliot,
shouted from another room that she knew the Masonic handshakes. Earlier Elliot had told Mr Kellett that many prominent people in the Labour Party were Masons.
All of this may seem unreal to our readers but it gives further examples of how Masons, be they judges, MPs, or their acolytes, have no fear of the consequences of what amounts to conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Lord Chancellor Mackay suggested that Mr Kellett apply to the Parliamentary Commissioner. Jesus wept!
LLOYD'S INSURANCE SWINDLES
Mr Royston D Leicester of Brighton has petitioned "Her Most Gracious Majesty, Queen Elizabeth the Second", in connection with crimes committed against him by Lloyd's Syndicates and others including a Masonic crook who has been promoted to Law Lord. Mr Leicester gave 22 years of his life to the police service. He has experienced more crime in the legal system than he did during his time as a police officer. We know just how much a petition means to Her Majesty and we will be glad to report on how effective Mr Leicester's petition has been. Everybody acknowledges, particularly the Americans, that Lloyd's are swindlers but our great Prime Minister who promised to make fair that which is unfair has ignored all complaints. His mentor, the Cardinal, has his snout in the same trough.
Stop Press - Mr Leicester has heard from the Queen's Private Secretary that Her Majesty has referred the matter to the Lord Chancellor. Let us see if the Cardinal has more respect for the Queen than he has for himself.
Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031