|
|
VOMIT UK 08/99
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 20 February 1999
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are.
MUTUAL AID
CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB. Fax 01223 327042. Ph 01223 327634 (Suzon Forscey-Moore, American Law Researcher)
POW TRUST, (A charitable organisation) 295a Queenstown Road, London SW8 3NP. Tel.0171 720 9767 Fax 0171 498 0477 (Gen.Secy. Peter Sainsbury).
NEW DEMOCRACY ACTION, PO Box 187, Chesterfield, Derbys.S40 2DU Ph/Fax 01246 555713 (Organiser Eric Giles)
SECRET SOCIETIES
Yakusa, the Yardies, the IRA, the Orange Paramilitaries, the Mafia, the Knights of St Columba, the Masons, Opus Dei, the Bilderberg Council, the Tongs. End of introduction.
HELLMANN, CHARLIE KRAY, COCAINE
On 15 February 1999 we wrote to the US Drug Enforcement Agency, the US Department of Justice and H M Customs & Excise Intelligence Unit giving them reasons to investigate Hellmann International Forwarders to ensure that Hellmanns were not involved in transporting drugs to the UK. Previous operators, Sargoods Paper Limited, had immunity from prosecution. New owners, Hearn and Son Limited, moved into the drug site. Hearn & Son benefited from corruption in planning and transport matters thanks to the non-intervention of Deputy Prime Minister Prescott.
At 1142 hours on 10 May 1995 Charlie Kray, accompanied by two bodyguards, arrived at the drug site. At 1205 Kray left with an estimated 10-Kg of cocaine. In the summer of 1996 Kray was arrested. On 12 July 1996 it was reported that Adrian C Watson, a director of Sargoods, had emigrated to South Africa. On 24 July there was a police visit to the drug site. Later it was reported that there had been two police raids on the drug site in connection with drugs and forged cheques.
So Watson, who was on site when Kray visited, was allowed to emigrate. Kray was arrested and the police were taking credit for ending the drug trade when they had previously promoted the drug trade. Charlie Kray was one of about ten people who visited the drug site on 10 May 1995. He was alleged in court to be the ringleader and punished accordingly. Kray was not the ringleader.
In June 1997 Kray, 71 years old, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for masterminding a drug operation. He has been incarcerated in Bellmarsh Prison, a high security prison. On 12 February 1999 Kray's appeal failed. We believe that he is a fall guy who is in a high security prison to prevent him from spilling the beans. There is something wrong when 71 year old man gets 12 years in a high security prison for doing something that had official approval
NORMAN SCARTH
In earlier reports we told how Mr Scarth, a 74 year old, had been on the Murmansk run during World War Two. He had fished dead bodies and live bodies out of the icy waters of the North Atlantic. Like many men of his age he had risked his life to put an end to Hitler's tyranny. Like many men he has been subjected to the tyranny of UK courts of law. He has been swindled out of his business and had his assets seized. He has travelled thousands of miles to expose the corruption in UK law and has supported many other victims. His only source of income is his Old Age Pension. Recently he started a course in Law at Leeds University. Seventeen judges on the European Commission on Human Rights have given him permission to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. The case is ostensibly about hearings having been held in chambers and not in open court. The Eurocourt will not deal with the corruption that occurred in chambers and the corruption that occurred away from the courts. It should do so but it will not do so. Let us give you one example.
On 10 January 1996 a District Judge made an order that Mr Scarth's assets were to be frozen. The case had to be heard again on 9 February 1996 to determine whether Mr Scarth's assets were to be handed over to someone who had made a claim against Mr Scarth. Unknown to Mr Scarth the hearing due on 9 February was brought forward to 24 January and taken in another court. Mr Scarth's assets were seized after he had been denied the right to defend himself by judicial trickery. Note that the people who were denying Mr Scarth justice would not have existed if people like Mr Scarth had not been prepared to lay down their lives for freedom and democracy.
DOCTOR JOHN DREWE
Dr Drewe was sentenced to 6 years in prison. Immediately the police were laying forth in support of the conviction and the media went to town as they did with the Birmingham Six and Guildford Four. When the trial finished the solicitors whom Dr Drewe had sacked returned his documents too late for use in the trial. The judge (Rivlin) said in his summing up that he was referring Gerald James' (of Astra/Matrix Churchill fame) use of documentary evidence to the Director of Public Prosecutions. The documents had already been exposed in another trial and will be exposed again in a case against H M Government.
We do not know whether Dr Drewe was guilty or not but we do know that there were some strange events during his long trial. Why was his Legal Aid Certificate withdrawn when he sacked his solicitors? Why did his sacked solicitors hold onto his papers while he defended himself for 16 weeks? What was the story about the shipment of arms to both Iran and Iraq when the two countries were at war with each other? Why did the Prosecution deny the existence of Allivane International? Why did the judge prevent at least one witness from giving evidence?
If MI5, MI6 and the CIA are prepared to deal in cocaine they are also likely to deal in fake art.
GREATER MANCHESTER POLICE
This letter from Geoffrey Scriven (phone 0161 428 0764 - Fax 0161 428 1159) to Chief Constable David Wilmot is self-explanatory. It is dated 16 February.
### Dear Chief Constable,
I would appreciate a reply to my letter and request, dated 25 January 1999, sent to you by fax and recorded delivery; if for whatever reason, you are unable to do so, I would appreciate an acknowledgement at the very least, if only out of courtesy.
I do accept and understand that you have your own GMP domestic problems, such as The Audit Commission Report, and the gross misconduct of Cressey and Rushton, breaching European Law concerning tendering and contracting.
The attached "City of Fear" dated 13th February 1999 is self-explanatory and self-evident.
If you are too frightened to deal with the organised crime perpetrated by the legal profession, judiciary and CPS, within the GMP area, then you must resign and make way for someone who will.
The evidence has been accepted by your officers, commencing with D.I.Cook and D.Sgt. Baxter in August 1998, and further accepted by a Stipendiary Magistrate on 14th September 1998 and the Crown Court on 23rd December 1998. All the evidence is supported by internal court documents.
You should not be afraid because "the Godfather" of this Mafia, is the Head of the Judiciary and number three, (unelected), in the Cabinet, with none other than the Prime Minister as his "mentor".
You will only gain the respect of all the public you serve, by grasping this nettle and removing it totally.
Yours sincerely, (Signed) Geoffrey Scriven. ###
Comment:- This letter will appear to be a bit much for those of you who have not been tormented for years by public servants whom you have been brought up to respect. The malaise goes much deeper than malfeasance by those responsible for ensuring that everyone is equal before the Law. The final responsibility lies with the Prime Minister who had signally failed to keep his promise to "make that fair which is unfair". His head should roll first.
Note that Mr Scriven's father was flying bombing missions over Germany while his mother was rushing to the air raid shelters carrying baby Scriven in her arms. Mr Scriven is now being persecuted by the people who owe their existence to the courage of people like his father.
CRIME THAT DARE NOT SPEAK ITS NAME
There are two crimes, which our superiors have conveniently forgotten. The first one is (R v. Dytham) misconduct in public office (misfeasance, malfeasance and nonfeasance - Lord Widgery). The second one is obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception. Why are all the bent officials and elected representatives not being prosecuted? Why are supermarkets and other sellers not prosecuted for obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception? Why have Greater Manchester Police not taken action on the Scriven complaint (above) ? That is misconduct in public office.
DORSET POLICE AND COUNCIL MASONS
We are pleased to announce that Detective Phil Cox has started to clean up this force. Mr Coulter's opponent in a civil action has been charged with perjury. Should he be found guilty he will lose his Legal Aid and may face charges of fraud. That would account for the sudden cancellation of Mr Coulter's court hearing. We unreservedly apologise to Mr Coulter's solicitors for the suggestion that they might be selling him out. The solicitors acting for the perjurer may also be prosecuted because Mr Coulter warned them that their client was committing perjury. Instead of acting on the information they sought to have Mr Coulter prosecuted for theft. They too must be Masons.
The bad news is that there is no indication that ACC Pothecary is going to resign or be transferred to another force. We hope that the police authority will ensure that its next Chief Constable is not and has never been a Mason.
DACORUM'S CESSPIT MASONS
Dacorum Borough Council is the council that is dominated by Freemasonry. Labour still controls it after the defection of four Labour councillors and the Lib Dems accepted 20 pierces of silver. Another Labour councillor was browbeaten into staying on board following an attack on his wife's business premises. The Masons within the council are hand in glove with businessmen and professional people outside the council including the editor of a local newspaper. This week we have a copy of a letter from Mr Charles Beresford to the Chief Executive of the council, Keith Hunt, who would have been punished twice over by Adolph Hitler. Mr Beresford is a first class driver and driving instructor. Nobody would accuse him of being a first class letter writer. For example Mr Beresford threatens to "sew" when he means, "sue". It was the council that "sewed" him. i.e. stitched him up. While we and others familiar with Mr Beresford's case know what he is writing about we suspect that no other person reading his letter would find it comprehensible. Surely one of the Dacorum Action Group could have edited his letter.
This is yet another Right to Buy racket. If a tenant exercises his Right to Buy his house and if the council sees the exercise of the right as a threat to it or to its friends the tenant will invariably be unlawfully denied his Right to Buy. We have had the same problem with a corrupt Westminster City Council primarily because we asked about the location of asbestos. In Mr Beresford's case his property was next to a builder's yard leased by Woodman and Anderson of Hemel Hempstead.
Mr Beresford found out at a late date that his solicitors were Masonic and were being professionally employed by the council. The council used the Watford office while Mr Beresford used the Hemel Hempstead office. His solicitors did not apply themselves diligently to the Beresford case and may well have retained important documentation.
The main point, which we would make, is that our subscribers must show their correspondence to an informed friend before posting it to a corrupt authority.
HUGHENDEN PARISH COUNCIL, HIGH WYCOMBE
Simply by reading scurrilous reports in the Bucks Free Press we know that this parish council is on a par with Chalfont St Giles Parish Council. There is an educated lady councillor who is clearly not a Mason. For years she has openly criticised her own council. Recently a controversial planning decision went her way and against the majority of her fellow councillors. Now the knives are out. The chairman of her council is given full coverage, on the front page, for his defamatory opinions. Those local rags are not even-handed. Understandably they never allege corruption. They join in the character assassination of the most independent and able councillor in Hughenden Parish Council, Mrs Gloria Leflaive. They do not give coverage to replies in support of the lady councillor. The editor of the rag is named Steve COHEN!
Another matter that concerns us is the use of the former Chief Executive of Chiltern District Council, D G Sainsbury, to preside over an enquiry into the lady's behaviour. Barry Catchpole of Wycombe District Council was delighted to succeed Sainsbury but quit the job after a short time. Chiltern District Council was not his cup of tea post Sainsbury. This is the council with two opposing Masonic factions. The present Chief Executive Goodrum, who came from Leeds (Kirklees?) announced to the Press that there were also two Tory factions. Goodrum is supposed to be independent and blind to politics. Sainsbury's sidekick, another wicked solicitor, R E N Purton, slung her hook and took employment with Stratford upon Avon council. Within one year she was off sick in Little Chalfont after she had been caught helping herself to expenses without authority. These two will answer for their sins. We understand that there is a D G Sainsbury entry in the telephone directory. We want him prosecuted.
CITY OF LONDON POLICE
In the Estates Gazette of 13 February, on page 66, there is published a letter headed "VO enlists Inland Revenue to investigate rates appellant". It is connected with corruption in Chiltern District Council acting in collaboration with the District Valuer R F Williams to pervert the course of justice. An individual was representing a company in the High Court for an appeal against a decision by the Valuation Officer, R F Williams. The Inland Revenue solicitors represent Williams. The Inland Revenue lodged a document in Court providing details of the Inland Revenue record of the person who was acting for the Appellant. The implications of this are horrendous for any professional person opposing the Inland Revenue on behalf of a client.
Because Chiltern District Council and the Valuation Officer had fiddled the record, the property could not be identified from the Rates Valuation List and was therefore not rateable. Rates were being withheld to force identification of the property for planning reasons. Simultaneously the Appellant was successfully suing Bucks. County Council. Chiltern District Council and its legal representatives fraudulently obtained a Winding Up Order against the Appellant company and enabled Bucks. County Council to avoid paying substantial damages. The City of London police are supposed to be investigating the affair and have been given enough information to enable them to proceed. So far they have spent more time trying to frustrate the complainer than in trying to investigate the complaint.
MAURICE KELLET - BLOODIED BUT UNBOWED
Mr Kellett offended the Masons of Northeast England, the Bad Lands of Labour corruption and home to Blair, Mullin, Cunningham and Hoon. Cunningham, senior, did time in prison for corruption. Blair has not been charged.
### Carr, our neighbour, had commenced court action for my "trespass" on our own land. I sued for damage to our property and for an injunction to stop her flooding our property. After a time I engaged Nancy Bone, solicitors, Durham. When Nancy Bone wrote to Smith and Graham of Durham requesting an important file Smith & Graham replied "the file has gone missing in the Bermuda triangle of documentation and despite extensive searches it cannot be found". Inspector Peacock, the Mason, had previously asked for the name of my solicitor when Smith and Graham acted for me. Peacock then told me that he had not contacted Smith & Graham. Peacock had put his Masonic oar in.
Nancy Bone applied for Legal Aid on my behalf. Bone told me not to take it personally if things did not work out! The Legal Aid Board in Newcastle refused the application on the grounds that there was an injunction in place. The Legal Aid Board lied. My appeal against the Legal Aid Board's decision was turned down for the same reason even although it had before it clear proof that there was no injunction in place. Lord Chancellor Mackay gave me the Masonic run-around. The Legal Aid Board is a Masonic tool for corruption. ###
Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031