|
|
VOMIT UK 37/99
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 11 September 1999
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are.
ALBERT DRYDEN
CK 0635 Dryden A@"C" Wing-H M Prison Garth-Ulnes Walton Lane-LEYLAND-Lancs.
Nobody condones killing Chief Planning Officers or human beings. Albert Dryden did not commit the offence for which he is serving a prison sentence. Under the UK Bill of Rights everyone has a right to bear arms to defend one's person and property. Even the dictatorial Blair government cannot take that right away. It is a constitutional right. In all the circumstances, if Albert Dryden had been properly defended in court, he would not be in prison now. We hope that someone will start a fighting fund to secure his release from prison.
THE COUNTRY WITHOUT MORALS
One in three children in the UK lives below the poverty line. That conceals terrible suffering and a massive squandering of human resources. There is no money to deal with deprived children but we could spend billions on Kosovo to replace one sort of genocide with another. We supplied the weapons that are killing innocents in East Timor and we will continue to deal with the Indonesian government.
Our gun toting police forces are now no better than the Gestapo. They crucify the halt and the lame, the old and the young and, above all, the innocent who stand up for their rights and democracy. Our judges are a disgrace and our courts a shambles.
There are thousands of people running charities and they all have the same motto "Charity begins at home". The Charity Commissioners are a bunch of crooks. (Combined Charities Trust and Council for the Protection of Rural England - Prunella Scales). The National Lottery is a tax on the poor.
STOP PRESS A focus group has convinced Blair that he must have schools preaching the importance of marriage. Presumably that is why he has picked a cabinet full of lesbians, sodomites and adulterers. As Chris Smith, Ron Davies, Nick Brown and Peter Mandelson might say "Focus".
TONY'S CRONY VERSUS GEOFFREY SCRIVEN
Attorney General Morris shuffled off into the wings and was replaced by another Tony crony, Mostyn. Before he quit Morris started an action to have Geoffrey Scriven committed to prison for contempt of court in that he had been in breach of undertakings which effectively said that no matter how corrupt judges were he would keep quiet about it. So Mr Scriven was being asked to commit offences by not reporting crimes committed by judges. The undertaking had been given under duress. Two policemen were in attendance to arrest Mr Scriven. Having made his point Mr Scriven believed that judicial corruption would cease.
On Friday 10 September 1999 Mr Scriven appeared to hear a judgement by Judge Hughes in Crewe County Court. Hughes gave the Law Society everything it asked for and more. After the hearing a solicitor informed Mr Scriven that the whole legal system would collapse by Christmas and that Woolf was a fool. Mr Scriven was less complimentary about Woolf. We agree with Mr Scriven. Our victims are now facing state terrorism in earnest - police brutality, medical abuse, judicial corruption, sycophant MPs., MI5 and MI6 out of control and the news media under control. Blair has the final responsibility for this just as he was responsible for the killing of thousands of Serb civilians. Decent members of the Labour Party are leaving the Party in droves.
DORSET AND AN APPEAL TO TWO MASONIC LODGES
Frank Charles Jarvis was a member of a member of a lodge in Westcliffe-on-Sea. Alfred Edward Handley was a member of a lodge in Stanmore, Middlesex. The two men were grandfathers to Miss Lomond Handley who was a Liberal democrat (Libdem) Dorset County Councillor and Poole Borough Councillor (Phone/Fax 01202 738982).
A Dorset County Councillor resigned because he was in the same Masonic Lodge as another Mason who had a connection with the company that was awarded a multi-million pound waste disposal contract. County officials, also Masons, tried to deflect criticism by pretending that there would be more openness in the County Council. The Masons on the council demanded a voluntary code, which would have enabled them to carry on cheating as before. Miss Handley stood up and commenced her speech by saying that she wasn't a Mason. There was loud laughter because at that time nobody knew about female Masons or Masonnes. This naturally infuriated the Masons who are singularly lacking in humour when they are not taken too seriously. Following the meeting a Libdem councillor telephoned Miss Handley and insulted and threatened her. She was then scandalised behind the scenes and deselected without being given an opportunity to defend herself. That is a standard Masonic practice. Miss Handley now states that the Mason who made the offensive telephone call was County Councillor John Noyes. Noyes, as far as we know, is not related to Alfred Noyes of the Hammersmith Lodge. Alfred was extradited from Spain to face a murder charge following a road rage incident. He should not have been extradited but got special treatment because there was a Pinochet trade-off and he had earlier stabbed a policeman to death. Noyes was acquitted in the police case. It was wrong to take a female to Spain to identify him.
We can see no reason why Miss Handley should lie about Noyes but we will nevertheless publish his account if he cares to inform us of his defence. The mother lodges of the two grandfathers should intervene unless some Masons are more equal than others. In fact Freemasonry is for the benefit of the few. The many serve the cause loyally and benefit from the Masonic corruption, which permeates society. However if the two mother lodges enable Miss Handley to sue the pants off Noyes we will see them in a different light.
IS CHIEF CONSTABLE STICHBURY A MASONNE?
What on earth is this woman playing at? The following await action by this lady. Barry Hunt (ph/fax 01305 777348), Mr & Mrs Masefield (Ph. 01308 485412. Fax 01308 485729) Robert Owen (Fax 01929 424528) David Husband and two families connected with him (Ph 01305 826900 Fax 01305 860086) Gerald Coulter (Ph/Fax 01923 262726) Stichbury should also find out why her bent coppers arrested Lomond Handley (Ph/fax 01202 738982). May we suggest that the oppressed citizens of Dorset keep distributing VOMIT pamphlets until we have 50 victims in Dorset. We can then find a site where we can focus action against the Masons in Dorset County Council, the courts and the police. Let us start with the indictment if Peter Harvey, the crook who walks on water.
GERALD COULTER AND THE BENT SHERIFF FOR DORSET.
We have explained how a valuable car was stolen from Mr Coulter and how the bent car dealer who "bought" it was the brother of a senior police officer with Dorset police. The cop was also a Mason who managed to frustrate the whole recovery process, which led to the death of another bent Mason, solicitor David Dolton. The harder Mr Coulter fought for his rights the more determined were the Masons to cause him serious loss. Chief Constable Aldous and his deputy May took early retirement. Stichbury is not tackling the cause of most crime. She is not tackling Freemasonry.
One man who obstructed the legal process was the Sheriff of Hampshire. In connection with his failure to act in accordance with law a firm named White and Bowker (Commercial Solicitors Fax 01703 329777)) are harassing Mr Coulter contrary to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. They state that costs incurred by the Sheriff who did not do his duty are payable to White and Bowker. To explain this Masonic type claim they state that the Under Sheriff is a partner in their firm. In fact all costs in the case should be borne by the police and anyway White & Bowker know that there is an appeal and that police enquiries are taking place that could lead to action against the Sheriff and them. The Coulter case is awash with corruption from the police, the County Council and the courts. Dorset Police are supposed to be investigating what are in fact clear-cut cases. In all such Masonic cases enquiries are delayed until the damage is done or the police find that the allegations against the wrongdoers cannot be substantiated. There will be violence in Dorset and elsewhere if the police don't put their house in order.
WALK ALONE
For 20 years we, being Masonic, did not appreciate that Masonry was crucifying us. For the last 20 years we have been publishing details of our experiences. Nobody believed us. Our correspondents were unfriendly. We began to doubt ourselves until we got in touch with others who had been victims of our legal system. We published details of corruption in public services. Other victims of Freemasonry confirmed that, in the final analysis the police and the judiciary were the most dangerous elements in our society for the obvious reason that they are a law unto themselves and are backed by guns, rubber bullets, live ammunition, CS gas, prison bars and Masonry. The politicians co-operate with the crooks because it gives them immunity from prosecution.
This brings us to the latest outrage by the police against Norman Scarth and against VOMIT (J M Todd). The difference between Norman Scarth and VOMIT is that Norman Scarth fights his own battle and turns up in courts throughout the land to support other victims. VOMIT reaches a world-wide audience virtually from a prison cell.
We reported how Mr Scarth (Fax 0113 262 4179) was put under siege by a police mob in Leeds and how this was followed by civil proceedings, which were predetermined without regard to the merits. Mr Scarth knows that there was some sort of conspiracy that put his life at risk but he does not know whether it is Freemasonry. Last week we reported how his opponent had failed to serve papers on him as directed by the court. In spite of that Mr Scarth was ordered to quit his home within 5 days. Unfortunately Mr Scarth has concentrated on telling us that the name of the house he has to quit is now "Tianamen House". He has not been able to tell us about his appeal. The opposition lawyers are Richards & Co of Leeds (Fax 0113 248 5778). The latest news is that the eviction judgement has been set aside and Mr Scarth's appeal will be heard on Monday 13 September at 10.30a.m. at the Leeds Civil Hearing Centre, 13/15 East Parade, Leeds. We still cannot see how this case can be determined if the Will is being concealed from a beneficiary under the Will. Note that Maurice Kellett who attended court on Mr Scarth's behalf is due in a Durham court on the same day at the same time. Mr Scarth will still not accept that Masonry is involved. One day he will be required to appear simultaneously in the High Court in London and in Leeds County Court. Let the penny drop then. Masons enjoy doing that sort of thing. It has happened to us although the courts were only 50 miles apart. (Lord Morton of Shuna - Hugh Morton, Chairman of a Glasgow Constituency Labour Party 1961)
The first attempt to censor VOMIT was made by the Labour Party through its regional offices then through the British Library, British Telecom twice and then Oftel twice. Then Demon Internet closed our Web page and cut off our access to News Groups without justification. Next Easynet cut us off from the Internet on 16 September 1999 without justification. An Easynet ratbag told us smugly "Two strikes and you're out". Two days later we had our first police raid on Wednesday 18 August when they forced entry into our premises after Southern Electric PLC (Lord Wilson of Tillyorn) and OFGEM had conspired to pervert the course of justice with the help of the Clerk to the Justices Savage. When the police mob arrived (probably 7 officers) on Sunday 21 August we could not make a telephone call for help. By chance Mr Peter Wilcockson called us. By the time he arrived the police had again fled. The evidence is that on Wednesday 18, Saturday 21 and Sunday 22 British Telecom (Sir Ian Vallance) was monitoring our telephone line, preventing us from making calls for help and warning the police that help was on its way to us. On the Wednesday a cop named Williams suggested that we had threatened to kill him. He called up what appeared to be a police marksman. The same man was present on Saturday and probably on Sunday. Because the incidents were fully reported in the Bucks Examiner the police had to come up with a story. What hey are saying is that, in a separate incident from the Southern Electric corruption, 7 police officers called at Misbourne Farmhouse twice in the absence of witnesses and without warrants to talk to a 74 year old man about his harassment of an individual and companies. The ringleader in the police operation was DC2333 Blankenback of Thames Valley Police(Fax 01865 846160). He telephoned VOMIT on 8 September and got a flea in his ear. He immediately faxed a letter dated 6 September - 2 days earlier. The letter should get him a prison sentence of around 7 years. We quote one of his sentences no doubt drafted by Detective Superintendent Alcraft. "You must not send any more correspondence, of any description to H Hearn & Son or to any person, company or organisation that has got anything at all to do with Mr Hearn". The Masons rule! Okay?
Another thing that the Scarth and VOMIT cases have in common is that Peter Moorhouse of the Police Complaints Authority has not acknowledged receipt of the complaints. The PCA is another body, which should be wound up. The following letter to Blankenback explains what the crooks were up to. What happened was that our outgoing calls were cut off, 7 police officers turned up on Saturday and Sunday morning early after they had unlawfully entered the house on the previous Wednesday. The drug site employees did not report as usual on Saturdays and there were no witnesses on the Sunday. Without a doubt the police were going to force their way into the house without a warrant and clear out computers and files. The 74 year-old was likely to finish up dead on account of the earlier lie by PC Williams that Vomit had threatened to kill. Masons kill defenceless old men.
To DC2333 Blankenback (Faxed to HQ at Kidlington on 01865 846160 on 9 September 1999. Please forward).
Dear Sir,
It is 6.30 a.m. Since 5.57 three Hellmann Parcel Systems articulated vehicles have sped in here and one H Hearn & Son Limited heavy goods vehicle has sped out. Currently there is a metallic noise from the drug site.
Last night I heard from the Dacorum Action Group which has been exposing the same sort of corruption in Dacorum Borough Council and Hertfordshire Constabulary. Again Freemasonry is involved and again two lodges appear to be fighting over the spoils. The DAC informs me that the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 does not apply when someone is investigating crime. Nor does it apply to companies. I do not know a single individual at the drug site
So you faxed me a second letter yesterday because a third party had caught you out. The third party faxed you a copy of the 1997 Act running to 13 pages. You misinterpreted the Act in order to conceal criminal activity amongst, inter alia, Thames Valley Police, Chiltern District Council, Bucks County Council and the DETR. You, British Telecom and Southern Electric have, by your recent criminal behaviour, demonstrated that, on the balance of probabilities, drugs are still being freely distributed in Chalfont St Giles with the blessing of Government. Our only interest in the site stems from the fact that we were swindled out of the site and denied fair hearings in courts and thereafter persecuted by animals like yourself in order that the drug operation could continue. Some of your colleagues view your behaviour with distaste and some with amusement.
You have been given all the information about corruption in Chiltern District Council and the unlawful development and use of the site. Since H Hearn and Son Limited "working in partnership with" Hellmann Parcel Systems have had the benefit of your lies you must be aware that they are guilty of harassment and criminal offences. E.g. conspiring with the police to pervert the course of justice.
The Police Complaints Authority is now dealing with your behaviour. It has so far failed to acknowledge receipt of my complaint. Perhaps Mr Moorhouse is in the Seychelles with his bagman. ###
MAURICE KELLETT AND NORTHUMBRIA POLICE
Mr Kellett (ph/fax 0191 526 4555) is due in Durham Crown Court on Monday 13 September at 10.30 for committal proceedings. He will meet counsel on the day of the hearing. This is not unusual. Conceal your defences, be committed for trial and solicitors and counsel earn another pay packet. Mr Kellett's solicitor is David Hughes of Harding Swinburne Jackson & Co at fax 0191 883 4554.
On 23 August 1999 Mr Kellett handed in a bundle of documents setting out, for Acting Detective Inspector Coxon, evidence of the criminal offences committed by judges, officials, solicitors and their clients. He did so because Coxon had taken a statement weeks earlier and it appeared that Coxon was play-acting. Recently Coxon has either been on holiday or dealing with the murder of a young girl or so it is said. In spite of numerous telephone calls to Coxon and promises from other officers that Coxon would ring Mr Kellett there has been silence. We think that Coxon is a Mason specially selected to neutralise Mr Kellett.
MUTUAL AID
CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB. Fax 01223 327042. Ph 01223 327634 (Organiser - Suzon Forscey-Moore, American Law Researcher)
POW TRUST, (A registered benevolent and social welfare charity) 295a Queenstown Road, London SW8 3NP. Tel.0171 720 9767 Fax 0171 498 0477 (Gen.Secy. Peter Sainsbury).
Lloyd's world-wide swindles http://www.truthaboutlloyds.com email info@lliarsoflondon.com
Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031