|
|
VOMIT UK 19/99
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 8 May 1999
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed right of reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to suffer from the machinations of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
From the Times Law Report on 3 May 1999, page42.
### Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex Parte Garner and Others.
It was conceivable but in a rare case judicial misconduct might be an exceptional reason by which the Home Secretary would make an ex gratia compensation payment for wrongful conviction.
The Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Rose and Mr Justice Richards) so held on April 19 in allowing the applications of Anthony Garner, Jonathan Carter, William Thompson, Mohamed Tawfick and John Taylor for judicial review of the decisions of the Secretary of State to refuse their applications for compensation for wrongful conviction.
LORD JUSTICE ROSE said that each case challenged a refusal by the Home Secretary to award compensation under either section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 or his statement to Parliament on November 29, 1985.
In failing to consider whether judicial misconduct was so gross as to give rise to exceptional circumstances, the respondent had improperly fettered the exercise of his discretion. It would no doubt be a very rare case indeed where judicial misconduct had caused a period in custody. ###
Comment:- Learned judges have the ability to confuse the issues and incorporate hidden messages in their pronouncements. There is an admission that there was judicial misconduct but probably not gross misconduct. Because Jack Straw had failed to consider the possibility that there had been gross judicial misconduct in determining whether there was entitlement to compensation for time spent in prison Straw's decision will go before the High Court for Judicial Review.
Judicial misconduct is misconduct is public office and is a criminal offence (R v Dytham). It is a safe bet that the guilty judge will not be prosecuted and that the detainees will not be compensated. The lawyers will be the only winners.
There is an inference that judicial misconduct is rare. There are litigants who will name a large number of High Court and Appeal Court judges who have been guilty of gross judicial misconduct. Ask Geoffrey Scriven, Peter Prankerd, Bernard Gough, Nicholas Haralapides, Gerald Adshead, Peter Hayward (S N W Lyell), Paul Jenkins, Richard Price, Robert Owen, Gerald Coulter, Norman Scarth, Maurice Kellett and others too numerous to mention. These litigants accuse upwards of 100 senior judges of misconduct amounting to corruption.
THE INVENTORS ROBERT OWEN AND BERNARD GOUGH
Last week we reported how these two inventors had been swindled and how their bankers had collaborated with the swindlers. We read that Douglas Buchanan is now suing Rose and Catherall Limited, part of the Vickers Group, for around 6 million pounds because of a failure to properly produce, develop and market his knife-proof body armour. The case is sub iudice. Buchanan's lawyer has unsuccessfully attempted to persuade the judge, Mr Justice Ian Kennedy, to stand down.
MORE ON MAURICE KELLETT.
Mr Kellett is the man who upset the Masons in the Labour Bad Lands of Northeast England. Here he does more nit picking primarily to show how Freemasonry works and to help people who have suffered similar experiences.
### Following my imprisonment in July of 1996 and further harassment of my wife and me by Carr and Pringle, I received a letter from the Legal Aid Board at Eagle Star House, Fenkle Street, Newcastle on 3rd September 1996 saying that they were considering withdrawing Legal Aid from me. The Board claimed that my Counsel, Michelle Temple, had informed it that I had no hope of success in three cases in which I was involved.
The trials were due to commence on 21 October 1996. My solicitor, Mrs P Tench of Jacksons Solicitors, Darlington, County Durham telephoned my wife on 5th September saying that she was going to protest to the Legal Aid Board. She agreed that Michelle Temple's opinion was very favourable to me winning my cases and defending against the other. I obtained a copy of Michelle Temple's opinion. The Legal Aid Board withdrew my certificate and lied to justify this - the Masons again! Mrs Tench stated that the reasons given by the Board were not valid. Mrs Tench copied to me her protest letter to the Legal Aid Board. The Legal Aid Board ignored her protest and withdrew Legal Aid on 12 September 1996. I appealed the Board's decision. The appeal was not listed to be heard until after 21 October. Mrs Tench said that the hearings would not be adjourned.
Now I had to represent myself. Jacksons Solicitors allowed me only a few copies of documents on the grounds that the bulk of the documents were required for taxing purposes. Mrs Tench arranged for me to have some copy documents. Later I found that I had been denied key documents. I was also to learn that the cases were to be taken by a corrupt judge. It would not have mattered how many documents I had. The Masonic Mafia controls the legal system.
Solicitor Alison Stott, Carr's former McKenzie friend, wrote to me saying that she had updated the judges bundle ready for trial. Afterwards I was to learn that substantive documentation had been deliberately excluded from that bundle. Solicitor Nancy Bone still withheld my files for the first year of litigation, and Jacksons Solicitors the rest. The corrupt trial judge who would prove that I was subject to Masonic conspiracy. ###
Comment: Legal Aid was introduced to ensure that the courts would not run out of cases and solicitors would not run out of money. It had nothing to do with access to justice. It was frequently used to deprive litigants of justice as in the Kellett and Adshead cases. We had our first experience of Legal Aid corruption in 1961.
THE DORSET COUNCIL AND POLICE MASONS
There follows a report from Gerald Coulter, the scourge of Dacorum Borough Council and the Dorset Masons. We would remind you that Chief Constable Aldous and his deputy May retired prematurely on 31 March 1999. Mr Coulter wrote to the new Chief Constable Jane Stichbury. He then telephoned her to ask if she had received his letter. He was told that Aldous was still in charge and was clearing up some unfinished business. CC Stichbury was not at Poole.
Peter Harvey (and thereby hangs a tale) resigned as Chief Executive of Dorset County Council but did not resign from the position of Secretary to the Police Authority. It was Dorset County Council solicitors who represented the police against Mr Coulter. His the case was struck out and Mr Coulter declared vexatious. How can a litigant be vexatious when represented by solicitors and counsel? Harvey is a member of Amity Lodge number 137,Masons Hall, Market Close, Poole, Dorset (Tel. 01202 672966). Mr Coulter telephoned Harvey at Police HQ (Tel. 01305 223966) where he is presumably still masterminding the sort of police corruption evinced in Mr Coulter's case. Mr Coulter reminded Harvey how he had violated regulations under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act in not recording complaints against Aldous and May over their failure to recover Mr Coulter's stolen car from car dealers Burke and Parvar. Harvey warned Mr Coulter that he would be in serious trouble if he published anything, particularly on the Internet, about his behaviour. Mr Coulter said to Harvey "Stop being a prat". Harvey went berserk and threatened all sorts of dire consequences if Mr Coulter called him a prat again. When Mr Coulter repeated the pejorative word Harvey seemed to spit into the telephone and then banged it down whereupon Mr Coulter wet himself laughing.
This man Stuart Burke, who had wrongful possession of Mr Coulter's car, has a brother Martin Burke who was not only in Dorset police but also in Lodge number 3345 when DCC May failed to impound Mr Coulter's car in 1995. May too is a Mason. The latest report on the car case reinforces the case against the police and the judiciary.
Previously we reported a number of resignations by senior police officers. There is now a demand for the resignation of Chief Constable Barry Shaw of crisis-torn Cleveland Constabulary.
THE LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN MUST BE CHOPPED
Her name is Ann Abraham. The complaint is against two bent solicitors in the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors who lied and covered up for C T Wilson, Westminster City Council solicitor. Here is a paragraph from Abraham's letter dated 6 May 1999.
### Before I consider what you say about the way that the OSS dealt with your complaint against the Westminster City Council, I must apologise for the fact that your query concerning the letter that was sent to you on 8 March 1999 has not been answered. I can see that the first line of that letter has caused you a considerable amount of concern. In fact, the letter should have thanked you for having contacted the Office rather than saying "Thank you for returning your recent letter". The word "returning" was included by mistake. You had sent correspondence to this Office via e-mail and fax, but not by letter. I apologise for this error. I can also confirm that, provided we have enough information, there is no strict requirement to complete the Ombudsman's application form. ###
You may wonder why it took Abraham nearly two months to "explain" the returned letter after she had been asked about it several times. She was pretending that I had sent an application form. Regarding the last sentence here is what she writes in her letter of 16 February 1999.
### Also enclosed is an application form, which must be completed in all cases. ###
Here is the background to this. We lived in a mews flat in Bayswater. Our landlords sold the flat to property developers. With a fine disregard for our legal rights the owners, in collaboration with Westminster City Council, forced us to accept a tenancy from the council. When we tried to improve the council flat we found evidence of asbestos. The council ignored questions about asbestos. Unknown to us we had stirred up a hornet's nest. We lived on the third floor and had to use the elevators, which had been installed by Otis. Part of the Otis contract involved maintenance. The terms of the maintenance contract were so good that the lifts should have been trouble-free for 100 years. They rarely worked. We complained. Another company replaced the lifts at great expense. The lifts still did not work. The old lifts could have been made to work with proper maintenance. The council awarded a contract to Troy engineering to install central heating. Troy had to remove all asbestos from the main ventilation shaft. Troy's employees refused to remove the asbestos because the work was too dangerous. The asbestos is still there. We exposed the council malpractice. The leader of the council, then Lady porter, was a woman who would brook no opposition. She was Milosevic in skirts. We exercised our Right to Buy our flat in order to get information about the asbestos and later sell it. We asked the District Valuer about the asbestos. He replied that he was familiar with the property. He said nothing about the asbestos. It would have reduced the value of the flat. We completed an RTB6 form requiring the council to state the locations of asbestos. The council was obliged to return an RTB7 form within a prescribed time giving the locations of asbestos. It did not return the RTB7 form within the time prescribed. It claimed that it had done so. It could not provide proof of posting the RTB7 form. This meant that in law all rent paid from the date of the council's failure to return the RTB7 form was deemed to be a payment towards the purchase of the flat. The council repeatedly tried to evict us for non-payment of rent. Chiltern District Council unlawfully obtained warrants for our arrest and kept us away from the courts. When Porter left the council we approached the City Solicitor, C T Wilson, in order to establish our rights. He did not reply but referred us to the Home Ownership Centre, which repeated the council's falsehoods. About ten years later our MP, Karen Buck, received a letter from the Home Ownership Centre telling her that there was no requirement for the council to provide proof of posting. It can be shown that the council was freely using the recorded delivery service. For example it used a recorded delivery letter to tell us that it was extending the period during which we would be allowed to exercise our Right to Buy. The City Solicitor did not at any time try to resolve the matter. When we reported him to the OSS he came up with the usual false statement which he had presumably obtained from documents which Porter had not shredded. We still do not know all the locations of the asbestos. The solicitor is guilty of misconduct in public office.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
There follows a message to Vomit from John W Willmott - email tiojuan@flinet.com
### Hi Vomit! Didn't get to say thanks for your last brief one. So thanks! Seems some folks/blokes in London don't like queers and bombed their pub. Naturally, those bomber blokes could not let the USAY have all the violent news and attention after the Colorado School massacre so had to do a bloody. Too bad they didn't do it to 10 Downing and make it work this time. Last time a missile was fired and exploded harmlessly. You Brits should learn to shoot straight as well as to swing your butts like a bunch of sissy women! But then, the guy who martyred himself by crashing his plane on the White House lawn about 8 or ten years ago was not much of a hero either - and certainly was a lousy pilot. He should have had 200 pounds of nitro or TNT and flown it right through that window - you know the one I mean. And I am mean - meaning to say someone should get rid of those real mass murderers who go around lobbing shells and launching cruise missiles on innocent people in Iraq and Yugoslavia who had not a voice in electing their leaders. But what do I know? I am quitting now because the Kentucky Derby - "Darby" as the Brit announcer says - will be at the post in 35 minutes at Churchill Downs. How come they didn't name it Stalin Downs or Roosevelt Downs or better yet Hitler Downs? Did you get out your bulletin this week? What about your web page? Cheerio. John W. Willmott ###
### Hi, Hi John, We would ask you to desist from using the generic term "queer" to describe homosexuals and sodomites. The majority of Brits abhor the very idea of anal sex. Even our brave Mr Blair has not yet kept his promise to allow education funds to be used for school courses on the joys of homosexuality. The same Brits abhor the indiscriminate bombing of human beings - even Masons. For your information it was the IRA that missed Downing Street. We note that you have kept quiet about your hatred of the Jews other than to suggest that Hitler Downs would be an appropriate name for a racecourse. As we recall you rescued many Jews from Hitler by flying into Portugal during the war. You then cheated on Hitler by flying bombers over Germany while pretending that you were part of a Canadian Squadron. In this old country you would be arrested for incitement to murder. Mr Blair who is loved by all and especially by himself. Besides there is no need to kill him since he is busy digging his own grave in Ulster and in Serbia. We should never have embarked on a war with Serbia. The Serbs and the Iraqis will be insulted to learn that you think them unable to understand what is happening in their countries. Next you will be telling us that the Germans did not know what the Nazis were doing to the Jews. Blair is no different from Milosevic in that his MPs dare not criticise his policies. Yours fraternally, Vomit. ###
Note: Michael Mansfield recommends that there should be a restriction on incitement to racial hatred. Bomber Blair supports him. Edwina Currie, a former Jewish M P, said "Sticks and stones will break my bones but names will never hurt me". Racialism is a human trait and is not always antagonistic. e.g. A Scotsman dashed into the middle of the road to pick up a penny. He was run over and killed. The English coroner recorded a verdict of "Death from natural causes". Incitement to violence or the use of violence is wrong. Censorship is the surest path to violence. The most racialist organisation and the greatest threat to civil liberties is Freemasonry. People who believe that they are God's chosen people are also racialist.
MUTUAL AID
CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB. Fax 01223 327042. Ph 01223 327634 (Organiser - Suzon Forscey-Moore, American Law Researcher)
POW TRUST, (A registered benevolent and social welfare charity) 295a Queenstown Road, London SW8 3NP. Tel.0171 720 9767 Fax 0171 498 0477 (Gen.Secy. Peter Sainsbury).
NEW DEMOCRACY ACTION, PO Box 187, Chesterfield, Derbys.S40 2DU Ph/Fax 01246 555713 (Organiser Eric Giles)
Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031